The skirmishes between United States and Iran

  • Share this:

The skirmishes between United States and Iran has instigated a global war on trade and peace rampant in middle-east. Iran’s domestic policies are at daggers dawn as international pressure is somewhat cumulative to destabilize the region. Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran, United States has had become snail in the bottle to disparage Iran’s nuclear capabilities and eradicate the stability of Iran. Withdrawal of America from JCPOA deal which was imposed during Obama’s administration to proscribe the Iran’s nuclear captivity and allow economical trade to enhance the right as a sovereign country to inject its economy and national policies, has disseminated. It is perhaps to narrow the role of Iran and disintegrate the predatory leadership of Iran in order to dissipate the influence of Shiite in the region. 


The escalation between President Donald Trump and Rouhani ignited fuel to the fire in the world and caused much unrest for the States to accommodate the embattled furry. Under the 2015 deal, which was imposed by Obama to limit the nuclear activities of Iran in return for lifting of economic sanctions imposed by the member states. Upon the rise of President Donald Trump, Iran’s JCPOA deal has been distorted and left Iran was colossal economic sanctions imposed by Donald Trump. The effect of economic and oil sanctions on Iran would be detrimental because Iran’s 65.3% of the government budget is based on oil and gas export revenue pursuant to International Monetary Fund (IMF) report, 2012. If callous sanctions obligated by President Trump, then economy of the Iran would dwindle and inflation would blanket country. In such instance, there is a probability when the state is not economically strong, then foreign occupation is evident. Israel, Saudi Arabia and United States frivolously unrest the economy of Iran in order to foil the influence of Iran in the region. On the other side, Iran is the biggest oil producer, and export of oil and gas worth billions of dollars each year, which is injected to bolster the economy of Iran. If viscous oil sanctions imposed on Iran then European oil companies could be particularly hit - French company Total signed a $5bn deal with Iran, while BP has a joint venture to operate the Rhum gas field with Iran's state oil company. Also, other deals with Airbus and Tourism will also be hit causing detrimental effect on their agreement with Iran and other parties.


“Sentiment is sandwiched between fears that a U.S.-China trade dispute will hurt oil demand and looming Iranian supply shortages,” said Stephen Brennock, analyst at London brokerage PVM Oil Associates. It is evident that demand for oil will increase and supply will be discredit the States to enhance their economical objective. “China purchased Iranian oil at a rate of 671,000 barrels a day in April, while India imported 604,000 barrels a day. Together those two countries buy 60% of Iran’s total exports, more than double the combined purchases of the next two biggest importers, South Korea and Japan, according to Kpler, an oil-industry consulting firm”. India quiet blatantly didn’t recognized sanctions of oil on Iran because India heavily dependent on crude imports. It is evident that oil sanctions would create foil to the economy of Iran and its trading partners in the region. According to the official of India, it is purported that India would seek complete exemptions from the sanctions imposed by United States on Iran at the lowest ebb to maintain imports from Iran. China will also face hurdle primitive to the sanction imposed by United States to continue its trade and other industrial activities.





The sanctions are the manifestation to isolate Iran from the role in the middle-east to curtail the minatory threat that Saudi Arabia acknowledges from Iran. Iran is patronizing Lebanon Hezobullah group, Syria, Iraq and Yemen, to which, Saudi Arabia, Israel and United States are skeptical of the Iran’s influence in the region that could deteriorate stimulus of United States and Saudi Arabia in the region. Moreover, Saudi Arabia profound that Iran’s influence could disparage their power and influence from the middle-east, especially, embattled between shia and sunni.


History shows that a state’s economy is the element that accommodate foreign policy. The sanctions on Iran would ultimately deteriorate Iran’s influence internationally and the role played by Iran in the International spectrum would minimum to overthrow the leader. When the economy of the State is at the lowest ebb, the State would become a victim of foreign occupation, such as Suddam Hussain and Myanmar Gaddafi. The sole challenges that Iran would face is to embrace their leadership and stabilize its economy to support the people and preclude any foreign occupation. The furry of words exchanged between President Trump and President Rouhani likely cause upheaval for the other states and the region. Also, Iran has to maintain its economical factor stabilize to acclimate the scatter economy from the sanctions and rampant national policies to embrace the economy before it catches shattered.


In pith and marrow, oil sanction on Iran would escalate astringent tension across the States that rely heavily on their import oil from Iran. It would also tarnish the internal economical objective of Iran that would lead to inflation, unemployment and unrest across the country. Also, it would render ease to foreign occupation in Iran and coup Iranian leadership, which would make easier for Saudi Arabia to embattle Shia groups in Yemen and Syria and influence its dominance in the region. Narrowing the role of Iran in international politics would cause ease to Saudi Arabia and Israel to have their dominance in middle-east. To evade all such eruption, dialogue should undertake between United States and Iran to negotiate the agreement and allow trade to embrace economic and foreign objective of Iran to stabilize its role.

Sher Afghan

Sher Afghan

An experienced legal professional (LLB, BCom & LLM) with a reputation for integrity, innovative thinking and a proven understanding of the law and legal system in New South Wales and Lahore. Aside from a lawyer, I am a Confident communicator and writer who is able to liaise directly with statutory agencies and non-statutory agencies, Research Societies, Educational institutions and other legal and non-legal parties.